This article has been cited by other articles in PMC. Abstract Background Dignity has become a central concern in UK health policy in relation to older and vulnerable people.
Bibliography Definition The purpose of the discussion is to interpret and describe the significance of your findings in light of what was already known about the research problem being investigated, and to explain any new understanding or insights about the problem after you've taken the findings into consideration.
The discussion will always connect to the introduction by way of the research questions or hypotheses you posed and the literature you reviewed, but it does not simply repeat or rearrange the introduction; the discussion should always explain how your study has moved the reader's understanding of the research problem forward from where you left them at the end of the introduction.
Importance of a Good Discussion The discussion section is often considered the most important part of your research paper because this is where you: If appropriate, the discussion section is also where you state how the findings from your study revealed new gaps in the literature that had not been previously exposed or adequately described, and Engage the reader in thinking critically about issues based upon an evidence-based interpretation of findings; it is not governed strictly by objective reporting of information.
San Francisco Edit, Structure and Writing Style These are the general rules you should adopt when composing your discussion of the results: Do not be verbose or repetitive Be concise and make your points clearly Avoid using jargon Follow a logical stream of thought; in general, interpret and discuss the significance of your findings in the same sequence you described them in your results section [a notable exception is to begin by highlighting an unexpected result or finding] Use the present verb tense, especially for established facts; however, refer to specific works or prior studies in the past tense If needed, use subheadings to help organize your discussion or to categorize your interpretations into themes II.
The Content The content of the discussion section of your paper most often includes: If appropriate, note any unusual or unanticipated patterns or trends that emerged from your results and explain their meaning in relation to the research problem. References to previous research: This can include re-visiting key sources already cited in your literature review section, or, save them to cite later in the discussion section if they are more important to compare with your results instead of being a part of the general literature review of research used to provide context and background information.
Note that you can make this decision to highlight specific studies after you have begun writing the discussion section.
For example, describing lessons learned, proposing recommendations that can help improve a situation, or highlighting best practices.
This can be framed as new research questions that emerged as a result of your analysis. Organization and Structure Keep the following sequential points in mind as you organize and write the discussion section of your paper: Think of your discussion as an inverted pyramid.
Organize the discussion from the general to the specific, linking your findings to the literature, then to theory, then to practice [if appropriate].
Use the same key terms, narrative style, and verb tense [present] that you used when when describing the research problem in your introduction. Begin by briefly re-stating the research problem you were investigating and answer all of the research questions underpinning the problem that you posed in the introduction.
Describe the patterns, principles, and relationships shown by each major findings and place them in proper perspective. The sequence of this information is important; first state the answer, then the relevant results, then cite the work of others.
If appropriate, refer the reader to a figure or table to help enhance the interpretation of the data [either within the text or as an appendix].Ethical Issues in Conducting Community-Based Participatory Research: A Narrative Review of the Literature Abstract Community-based participatory research (CBPR) is a methodology increasingly used within the social.
IDENTITY THEFT LITERATURE REVIEW Prepared for presentation and discussion at the National Institute of Justice Focus Group Meeting to develop a research agenda to. For the specific review on racial and ethnic identity, we included the terms: racial identity, ethnic identity, and racial socialization.
For the section on social support, we included terms: support, social support, support coping, active coping, approach coping.
Examining Social Identity Theory in Sport Literature Review. LITERATURE REVIEW 2 Review of Literature The review of literature begins with an overview of the social identity theory.
children and the building of social identity at a young age is examined, and then finishing up is the discussion of cult-like followings of sport. Overview of. A REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE ON ETHNICITY, NATIONAL IDENTITY AND RELATED MISSIOLOGICAL STUDIES A Review of Literature on “Ethnicity” and “National Identity” discussion of the other three Just like most academic papers, literature reviews also must contain at least three basic elements: an introduction or background information section; the body of the review containing the discussion of sources; and, finally, a conclusion and/or recommendations section to end the paper.