Edmundson is trying to show how education has changed due to the leak of consumerism into universities.
What is the rhetorical i. What was your reaction to the opening paragraphs? How effectively do you think he addresses the concerns of readers who might disagree with him?
The class meets twice a week, late in the afternoon, and the clientele, about fifty undergraduates, tends to drag in and slump, looking disconsolate and a little lost, waiting for a jump start. To get the discussion moving, they usually require a joke, an anecdote, an off-the-wall question — When you were a kid, were your Halloween getups ego costumes, id costumes, or superego costumes?
That sort of thing. But today, as soon as I flourish the forms, a buzz rises in the room.
Today they write their assessments of the course, their assessments of me, and they are without a doubt wide-awake. But why am I so distressed, bolting like a refugee out of my own classroom, where I usually hold easy sway? Overall, I get off pretty well.
Yet I have to admit that I do not much like the image of myself that emerges from these forms, the image of knowledgeable, humorous detachment and bland tolerance. I do not like the forms themselves, with their number ratings, reminiscent of the sheets circulated after the TV pilot has just played to its sample audience in Burbank.
Most of all I dislike the attitude of calm consumer expertise that pervades the responses. Observes one respondent, not at all unrepresentative: That is not at all what I had in mind.
The off-the-wall questions and the sidebar jokes are meant as lead-ins to stronger stuff — in the case of the Freud course, to a complexly tragic view of life. But the affability and the one-liners often seem to be all that land with the students; their journals and evaluations leave me little doubt.
What book did you most dislike in the course?
What intellectual or characterological flaws in you does that dislike point to? The hand that framed that question was surely heavy. But at least it compels one to see intellectual work as a confrontation between two people, student and author, where the stakes matter.
Why are my students describing the Oedipus complex and the death drive as being interesting and enjoyable to contemplate?
And why am I coming across as an urbane, mildly ironic, endlessly affable guide to this intellectual territory, operating without intensity, generous, funny, and loose?
On evaluation day, I reap the rewards of my partial compliance with the culture of my students and, too, with the culture of the university as it now operates. Current critics tend to think that liberal-arts education is in crisis because universities have been invaded by professors with peculiar ideas: They believe that genius and tradition are out and that P.
Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.Feb 24, · Edmundson, Mark. “On the Uses of a Liberal Education.” From Inquiry to Academic Writing: A Text and Reader. Stuart Greene and April Lidinsky.
Boston: Bedford/attheheels.com’s, Print. Read Mark Edmundson’s essay “On the Uses of a Liberal Education: As Lite Entertainment for Bored College Students,” then answer these four questions bellow.
1)Edmundson chooses to open his essay memorably, with an extended anecdote about student evaluations. The schools systems of our nations society had and still have been stuck on the notion that education is not flexible.
And by that I mean the administrators and instructors that construct the courses for the average student in the United States stick to the bare minimum of creativity and stay to the norm that has been around for ages.
On the uses of a liberal education: 1. as lite entertainment for bored college students. September 1, Harper's Magazine.
Mark Edmundson. A college student getting a liberal arts education ponders filling out a questionnaire that includes an opportunity for him to evaluate his instructor. Francesca Tines Professor Karim English Mark Edmundson “On the uses of a Liberal Education” Mark Edmundson’s “On the uses of a Liberal Education” provides interesting points on why the liberal arts education is becoming part of consumer goods and how education is being advertised.
At some point in their exploration of Brazil, the Portuguese encountered an animal they called bicho-preguiça (lazy animal or animal sloth). (Portugese Wikipedia).The French called it Paresseux and the Spanish Perezosos or Pereza (lazy).
The English called it a Sloth.