Computers assist us with decisions that shape our everyday lives, from the directions we follow when driving, to suggestions as to the books and music we might enjoy. We expect instantaneous matches to our queries on Google, and anything we might wish to buy to be available online at the click of a button. These expectations are not limited to the private sector.
And so, if ever the formerly dispossessed people attempt to regain some of what they unfairly lost, then it will be countered by such technicalities.
In the case of the US, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand, they have, in theory, an enormous amount to lose if this declaration ever became a stepping stone to monumental indigenous claims, and therefore it is resisted.
The resolution for amendments to the draft was endorsed by 82 countries. As another IPS report notes, while disappointed with the recent vote, many still feel the declaration is powerful and positiveeven in draft form.
However, Amnesty International fears the delay could result in a weaker draft declarationfearing an attempt to reword parts of the declaration for future adoption, and warned that any rewording must be fully transparent, allowing all stakeholders to continue to participate.
They felt it was a tactic to ultimately kill the declaration: Packaged as a mere delay, the vote received no press coverage or wider attention. In fact, the tactic was designed to kill the declaration.
No regular sessions of the General Assembly are scheduled after mid-December, and there is no budget authorized for a special session. Why was the declaration shot down?
At least some African states are concerned that it does not define indigenous and that it supports self-determination for indigenous peoples. Those states take the view that all Africans are indigenous, and that self-determination—one of the key points of the declaration—only applies to nations trying to free themselves from the yoke of colonialism.
While fair concerns, the declaration, which is not legally binding, is clear that the meaning of these terms must be defined in context and negotiated between indigenous peoples and the state in which they live. But the real impetus behind the initiative came from the same very powerful states that have objected all along.
Predictably, Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the United States voted against the declaration when nations voted in favor of it. Opposing countries rethinking their stance? In OctoberInter Press Service reports that the four opposers to the declaration have all been rethinking their stance: Around the same time, the U.
Two of those, IPS also added, have since endorsed it: Back to top Customary Law—backward or relevant justice systems?
Many indigenous cultures having developed their own societal traditions and norms naturally have ways to deal with crimes. Various anthropologists and others have noted some interesting differences between some traditional systems of justice and modern law.The Department of Criminal Justice offers a Bachelor of Arts (B.A.) degree which provides the opportunity for comprehensive study of criminal justice, and a Minor in Criminal Justice.
Civil Rights Act of Signed into Law (July) For preceding events see: Civil Rights Bill Passes in the House Civil Rights Bill — Battle in the Senate.
George Soros rises again. The billionaire, who had dialed back his giving, has committed more than $25 million to supporting Hillary Clinton and other Democratic candidates and causes.
Course Overview. This qualifying Law degree is taught by the world-leading, research-active academics based in our prestigious Law School. They will introduce you to technical legal topics and help you to understand the ways that law shapes society.
Find out more about studying Law LLB Hons (M) at Lancaster University.
Civil Rights Act of Signed into Law (July) For preceding events see: Civil Rights Bill Passes in the House Civil Rights Bill — Battle in the Senate. Elected governments are false fronts coordinated by a global shadow government. Western Theories of Justice. Justice is one of the most important moral and political concepts. The word comes from the Latin jus, meaning right or law. The Oxford English Dictionary defines the “just” person as one who typically “does what is morally right” and is disposed to “giving everyone his or her due,” offering the word “fair” as a synonym.
Arctic: Change at the Top of the World, attheheels.com, September This next clip (10 minutes, transcript) is also an extract from another Democracy Now attheheels.com one is an interview by Amy Goodman and Juan Gonzalez with President Evo Morales of Bolivia in which they discuss indigenous rights and challenges.