The emotional moral and legal aspects of capital punishment

Determining the Deterrent Effect of Capital Punishment: Key Issues Many people have strongly held views on the deterrent effect of the death penalty. To others it is equally self-evident that there is no deterrent effect due to the rarity of the imposition of the death penalty and the emotionally charged circumstances of most murders.

The emotional moral and legal aspects of capital punishment

While this is certainly not a new question, it still has not been resolved and instead, there are some states that exercise their ability to punish the harshest criminals while others, generally for moral reasons, do not.

In examining the questions behind capital punishmentit is useful to consider public opinion and rhetoric behind this debate to determine for what reasons it is considered right or wrong to have such a criminal penalty.

To best examine the questions behind the arguments surrounding capital punishment, objectivity is important as is a keen mind for the differences between mere rhetoric and solid empirical fact. A great number of argumentative essays have been written both for and against it but oftentimes the evidence is not credible because of overt bias.

Public sentiment about capital punishment varies widely and although there is a great deal of data available about such opinions, the camps remain evenly split on every aspect of the debate, thus leaving some states that allow it and others that do not.

Even though there is plenty of information regarding the ethical issues involved, many people are unclear about the specific information regarding the topic.

Respondents were generally ignorant on factual issues. In other words, much of the public response to the issue of capital punishment is based largely on emotion, ethics, and in many cases religion while many of the facts go unnoticed. While this seems acceptable simply because it is commonplace for citizens to take moral or ethical stands on political topics based on personal feeling rather than established data, one must keep in mind that there are legitimate benefits and drawbacks to the practice when it is put into action that go far beyond the moral or philosophical.

As is the case in other arenas that instigate such strong sentiment the abortion or stem cell arguments, for example sometimes the facts are overlooked in favor of these moral internal ethical questions.

Several studies indicate a strong correlation between execution and the determent of crimes, especially murder. Tests show that results are not driven by tougher sentencing laws.

Although tough sentences that are imposed for serious non-capital crimes are generally extremely high, it is interesting that the thought of life in prison is not as much of a determent as the prospect of death.

Corporal Punishment

It should be noted as well that many studies reveal that this particularly the case if the execution has been highly publicized. The more publicity devoted to the execution, the more homicides decrease thereafter.

This decrease apparently occurs because capital punishment has a short-term deterrent effect on homicides" Phillips. It is impossible to wonder why this is the case.

[BINGSNIPMIX-3

It does not seem reasonable that a person capable of murder would stop short because of the threat of death by capital punishment because they had recently seen about it on television. In some senses, the idea that the murder rate would decline shortly after a publicized execution seems slightly absurd and one must wonder whether or not these figures might have been the result of other influences as well.

Most people, even if they are not exposed to the media to any great extent, realize that a crime such as murder will carry the death penalty, yet plenty of murders still occur.

Search Tips

It simply does not stand reason that the short-term effects of a publicized execution would have a great impact on someone already likely to commit murder. In a debate with such strong feelings on both sides, data is open to manipulation by parties wishing to influence public sentiment.

Data such as that above seems to strongly favor the continuation of capital punishment.The Ethics of Capital Punishment- SEEKING A STANDARD Contrary to modern practice in most jurisdictions, punishment for a crime and restitution for the victim are interrelated concepts.

In the case of premeditated murder, compensation is not available as an alternative; thus it should carry a mandatory death sentence, in recognition of the .

The emotional moral and legal aspects of capital punishment

Public sentiment about capital punishment varies widely and although there is a great deal of data available about such opinions, the camps remain evenly split on every aspect of the debate, thus leaving some states that allow it and others that do not.

The System-Wide Effects of Capital Punishment on the American Criminal Justice System: The Use of Computer debate regarding the use of the death penalty centers on emotional arguments regarding the moral questions generated by the use of the death penalty.

Specific deterrence pertains to the effects of legal punishment on those who have. The death penalty: debating the moral, legal, and political issues / "Does capital punishment act as a deterrent to the commission of certain crimes?

Is state-sponsored execution of criminals abhorrent to the standards of civilized society? punishment system is structured to create distance from the moral and emotional dimensions of the decision. As Scott Sundby observed, aggravating factors like ‘especially heinous” or “vile” give the jurors.

Second, those favoring capital punishment contend that society should support those practices that will bring about the greatest balance of good over evil, and capital punishment is one such practice.

Capital punishment benefits society because it may deter violent crime.

Capital Punishment-The Moral Issue - Mibba